Logo

Back

Start-Up UX Research & Design

Pleia

Tools

UX Research:Figma,Google Meets,SurveyMonkey,In Person,Canva

UI/UX Design:Figma,Adobe Photoshop,Adobe InDesign,Canva

Agile-React Team:Slack,Miro Board,Microsoft Teams,

AI: Open AI,Deepseek,Perplexity,Mistral AI

Dev:Next.JS,React Native,MongoDB,GitHub

Product Management:Discord,Notion,Figjam

The Team

Cansu Yener - Co-Founder

Pelin Gümüslü - Co-Founder

+ Dev Team

+ Legal Help

+ ESMT Coaches and mentors

+ People who believe in the product :)

Slide 1
Slide 2
Slide 3

PLEIA

All-in-one skincare guidance!

We are proudly graduated from the ESMT SEP & B2B Entrepreneurship Program.

pleia8pleia2

Ideation

Pleia's ideation started over coffee chats. My co-founder and I initially considered building an app that would connect wellness centers. After further discussion (our second cappuccinos were nearly finished at this point, meaning about two hours of intense ideation), we realized the real need was a simple way to improve skin health. This led to the evolution of Pleia into a personalized skincare platform. At some point during our conversation, we jumped into FigJam to organize and explore our ideas in a more fun and visual way.

pleia3

We had too many ideas! We had to first of all filter to continue our discussion. Here are some ideas we dropped early on:

We questioned whether to prioritize sustainability in skincare products, but:

  • It was hard to define clearly
  • Too time-consuming to validate
  • No strong market demand observed

Considered refillable bottles, but realized:

  • Users don't usually return products
  • EDEKA and Rossmann had similar systems that failed
pleia9pleia10

We also considered focusing exclusively on “face-scan for B2B” and reached out to many brands. Later on, only The Ordinary responded; the rest either declined or said, “We do not want to collaborate.” → and so we decided to focus on B2C first.

Ideation Benchmarking Part I

I started with looking at some competitors on “skin-care” topic. It was a broad topic but I already gained valuable insights with the first ideation benchmarking, and simultaneously started an online survey

pleia11
pleia12

My benchmarking didn't stop there, but my first assumptions were already forming with the first benchmarking I was doing & thanks to the first online survey results.

1. I had a general idea of what kinds of questions we could ask users. For example, menstrual cycles are important to consider when evaluating skin health. This let to the first important realization.

Biggest realization: We need to work with a dermatologist. We can't identify skin conditions on our own; we need someone who can be the face of the app and also teach us how to properly recognize skin concerns.

2. Another big realization: there are already a few apps that use facial recognition to detect skin conditions, but they consistently receive bad reviews. Why? Because they mainly operate B2B and promote the skincare products of the brands they're partnered with; they're brand-biased.

3. Very few apps actually ask about skin conditions. Most ask about skin types. For example, acne is a skin condition, whereas oily skin is a skin type.

The few that do ask about skin conditions are either:

a) not fully developed to recommend a wide range of products, or

b) not backed by dermatologists.

→ Good opportunity #1!

4. There's no app that helps users assess the actual skincare product they want to buy. Later, one app launched that lets you scan a barcode; but in our case, we're using image recognition technology.

→ Good opportunity #2!

5. There's no app that shows whether a recommended product is available in the user's country; or, if it's not, what a compatible alternative would be.

→ Good opportunity #3!

6. No app offers a “compatibility meter” that tells users how well a product matches both their skin type and skin condition. Some apps recommend products based on skin type, but none give a personalized compatibility percentage. → Good opportunity #4!

→ Good opportunity #4!

7. No app tells you what happens when you mix one product with another.

→ Good opportunity #5!

8. Apps like Cosmily show product ingredients, but:

a) They're not personalized.

b) The information is overwhelming. Most users don't want to become dermatologists; they just want clear, simple answers.

After some interviews with users on phone I have saw the core problem:

Core problem: The market is oversaturated, and I don't want to become a dermatologist or memorize every ingredient. Desired solution: I simply want to know whether a product is good for me or not.

So at this stage, our next task is to find out

Are features “Good Opportunities #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5” actual user needs, considering the main goal: “I want to know whether a product is good for me or not”?

and we need to find the face of our app, a reliable Dermatologist.

Competitive Benchmarking Part II - Continuous Benchmarking

During the research process, I continued exploring to uncover more apps and market opportunities o stay aligned with industry standards and user expectations. This additional benchmarking will be valuable later on, throughout the app ideation, prototyping, testing, and development stages.

One important finding in the Continioued Benchmarking:

OnSkin - AI Product Scanner, developed by AIBY in 2022, allows users to take a photo of a product, instantly find it in the app, and proceed to checkout. We also decided to validate this idea,will people take photos while shopping? But first of all, do they usually buy online or offline? → Good opportunity #6!

pleia13

Throughout the benchmarking I identified many competitors, but some competitors stand out the most with their similarities to our ideas. Here is one of them:

1. GetHarley

  • Derma Consultation - AI Provides access to online dermatologist consultations.
  • Product Recommendations - Offers personalized skincare product suggestions.
  • E-commerce - A platform where users can directly purchase recommended products.
  • Customized Routine Tracker - Tracks users' skincare routines and updates them based on progress or changes in skin condition.

Ideation Research

We conducted online research through the female skincare WhatsApp groups we're part of. Pros which are also cons: At this stage,we weren't sure whether to launch in the EU or the Middle East.The skincare and beauty WhatsApp groups in Berlin included people from all over the world, as Berlin is a highly international city. This gave us a broad overview of user needs without narrowing our focus to a particular demographic. Additionally, we conducted research to understand the global skincare market in order to identify where to position ourselves strategically. or maybe to have some additional clues on which skin-care needs to focus on.

Pros: Our target were 18-45 Females and the WhatsApp groups were exactly the right space for it.

pleia14

One key challenge during user interviews was that some participants responded based on assumptions about others rather than their own experiences; saying things like “Everyone prefers this” or “Everyone shops online.”

To address this, I added a short note before each in-person interview to remind participants to speak only from their own perspective. I shared this adjustment with the two UX designers and my co-founder, and all four of us applied this approach in future sessions.

What are we trying to find out?

We aim to understand the shopping experience of users, specifically in the context of skincare products.

Initial Stage of the Journey:

  • How do users begin their journey toward purchasing a product?
  • Do they first identify a skin problem and then look for a solution?
  • Are they influenced by social media personalities or influencers before deciding to buy?
  • Do they consult a dermatologist and purchase a product based on that recommendation?
  • What is the very first trigger or motivation that starts the journey?

Progression of the Journey:

  • Do users physically visit shops to browse products?
    • If so, what type of information do they typically look for?
    • How do they evaluate the products in-store?
  • Where do they receive the majority of their influence or guidance?
  • Do they tend to buy products online?
    • If yes, what information do they check online, and how do they check it?
    • Do they rely on product reviews, ingredient lists, expert advice, or something else?

Initial Stage of the Journey:

  • Do users have direct access to dermatologists for advice?
  • Do they feel the need to consult a dermatologist before making a purchase?
  • Are they influenced by social media personalities or influencers before deciding to buy?
  • Are there any tools or platforms they use to support their decision-making?
  • What are the pain points or moments of hesitation throughout their journey?

…and many more areas that may emerge as we dive deeper into user behavior and motivation.

After collecting the interview questions, I created initial personas based on the opportunity areas we had previously identified. Each persona represents a different motivation and starting point for why someone wants to purchase a product in the first place. They also prioritize different features during their decision-making process. After discussions with our product coaches, we decided to move forward with the first persona.

Product Coaches:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/oliveroechslein/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisaportz/

Personas for Ideation

pleia15

First User Journey → Draft

Some volunteers and I from various UX WhatsApp groups in Berlin collaboratively created the first draft of the user journey. Later, we realized it was not the best approach because none of us had prior experience with how an AI app journey works. Nevertheless, it became a valuable learning experience.

pleia16

First Ideation Mid Fid Wireframes with “Free Text” + several UI variations

Our main challenge was this: How can we design the shopping experience of a user within an AI-driven marketplace?

Such a marketplace does not currently exist in the market. At the time we were exploring this idea, even major brands like Amazon had not integrated AI into their apps in this way, so we had no examples to refer to.

At this stage, the only design influence we had came from the Mobbin app, where we explored available screens and user journeys in search of anything that could resemble an AI-driven marketplace.

pleia17pleia18pleia19pleia20pleia21

Fast Iterations

pleia22pleia23

What did I do? After collecting all feedback, I once again went out and spoke to people on the street to understand their real and immediate pain points. I collected their input, mapped the data in Figma, and detailed the first persona Elena Müller and renamed her to Kate Müller. Kate is not only based on offline interviews which I have conducted, but also based on online google survey results. With Kate, I then started defining the initial draft of the user flow. I started from the decision-making stage and followed the flow through to the purchase step, highlighting users' pain points throughout the product shopping journey. This was important step before the next design.

pleia24pleia25pleia26

Conclusion: Skincare is a Holistic Journey

What we learned throughout this process is that skincare is not a linear problem to solve,i it's a holistic experience. Every user we spoke to had different pain points, and addressing only one of them in isolation doesn't provide real value.

For example, users from South America often had access to dermatologists (sometimes even via WhatsApp), so identifying their skin type or condition wasn't the issue. Instead, their main struggle was finding European equivalents of the products they were already using back home.

Meanwhile, others prioritized having a routine builder, something that could help them check if a new product would fit into their current routine, if it would cause allergic reactions, or interact negatively with their existing products.

Another group had difficulties identifying their skin problems in the first place, they didn't know where to start or what their skin really needed.

Others trusted influencers for recommendations but struggled with finding reliable product reviews to validate whether the suggested items actually worked, especially for their skin type.

pleia27pleia28

The User Journey

At Pleia, we built the questions database in close collaboration with our trusted dermatologist Sally, to ensure medical accuracy and relevance. This helped us define what should be asked based on professional skincare criteria.

pleia29

As a next step we had to start thinking about user needs. We conducted user testing to uncover how people make skincare decisions and what pain points they face. These insights shaped the user journey, helping us understand how, when, and why users should be asked certain questions, then we discussed validity of those questions with our dermatologist and reshaped them according to user needs.

For the “product browsing” screen, we have only considered the user needs, and only worked with our dermatologist for the survey questions and survey results.

pleia30

Product Market Fit Research

pleia31

As we documented our early thoughts with our Dermatologist in Google Docs, it organically led us to define the core questions database. This step became the backbone for shaping both the information architecture and the user journey; two elements that needed to evolve side-by-side due to their interdependence.

As a next step we had to start thinking about user needs.

Webpage in parallel

pleia32pleia33

As next step, I joined more UX channels and collected a group of UX designers and researchers who doesn't have any knowledge of the app, and created a workshop

Workshop goals:

To creating the “test results” screen that is both valuable for the user but doesn't give too much information that they decide not to subscribe. Goal is to find the perfect balance.

pleia34

Second Ideation Mid Fid Wireframes with information Architecture for AI

We concluded the final results screens and decided to start implementing the technology, before joining the Dubai EXPO for investors. Here we were both working with software engineers and also developing the screens simultaneously.

pleia35pleia36pleia37

Branding Considerations

pleia38pleia39pleia40pleia44pleiagif

Overall Feedbacks From UX Perspective

Challenge

We had a wide range of functionalities to consider. So far, we selected the first user journey. In the first persona's case, the journey begins with the user looking in the mirror and realizing that something might be wrong with their skin.

This turned out to be the most complex user journey among the three we had outlined. If we had selected the third persona instead, we could have skipped several early steps such as identifying a skin problem, searching for solutions online, reading countless reviews, and experiencing confusion.

With this first persona, we are not solving a single issue. We are addressing multiple, layered needs. In the other personas, the scope was narrower and more straightforward.

What did we do wrong

At the time, we did not fully realize how technically demanding this journey would become. While creating the user journey map was manageable, building it into a working product proved far more complex than expected.

Most importantly, we underestimated a key limitation. Finding developers who would be willing to implement such a detailed and demanding flow without compensation turned out to be unrealistic.

What did we do well

Skincare becomes truly meaningful for users only when approached holistically. If we had chosen the third persona, we might have addressed a single need and launched quickly. However, we would not have touched the deeper, more essential concerns of our users. That is why, even against all accusations, we continued with the complex journey, to make the product truly meaningful for the user.

By selecting this complex journey, we were able to uncover pain points at every step. This process gave us a much clearer view of the emotional and functional triggers that shape user behavior.

This level of understanding will be highly valuable when we speak with investors. It shows that our approach is based on deep, research-driven insights. It also helps us lay the foundation for a more thoughtful and realistic product roadmap.

Marketing & Sales Cold Outreach

pleia42

Finance Plan

pleia43

Designing innovative solutions for next-gen devices and inventions.

cansufarahy@gmail.com

(152) 560-79-264

LogoLogo

© 2025 Cansu Yener